Here’s a deep dive into a unique gem you might have found nestled in the 'World Cinema' section of that beloved, slightly dusty video store back in the day – a tape that promised something quite different from the usual neon-lit action or high-concept sci-fi occupying the main shelves.
***
What happens when the journey becomes the destination, not just for the characters on screen, but for the creators themselves? That’s the quiet revelation simmering at the heart of Andrei Tarkovsky and Tonino Guerra's Voyage in Time (Italian: Tempo di viaggio, 1983). This isn't a film in the conventional sense; it’s more akin to leafing through a shared travel diary, eavesdropping on profound conversations between two artists searching for inspiration, location, and perhaps something more elusive – a sense of place, of belonging, in a world that felt increasingly transient, especially for the exiled Tarkovsky.
A Search Recorded
The premise is simple: we follow the legendary Russian director Andrei Tarkovsky, known for his meditative masterpieces like Andrei Rublev (1966), Solaris (1972), and Stalker (1979), as he travels through Italy with his friend and collaborator, the esteemed Italian screenwriter Tonino Guerra (a frequent partner of Fellini and Antonioni). They are scouting locations for what would become Tarkovsky's penultimate film, Nostalghia (1983), a deeply personal exploration of homesickness and displacement. Commissioned by the Italian television network RAI, Voyage in Time became an intimate document of this pre-production process, capturing not just the physical search for evocative settings, but the intellectual and emotional currents flowing between these two men.
Beyond the Scouting Trip
You might think watching filmmakers look at potential locations sounds dry, but the magic here lies in observing Tarkovsky himself. We see him wrestling with his profound sense of separation from Russia, a feeling that permeates every frame of Nostalghia. Guerra, ever the warm, grounded Italian counterpoint, guides him through misty landscapes, ancient towns, and forgotten villas. Their conversations drift from practical concerns – the suitability of a certain ruin, the quality of the light – to philosophical musings on art, faith, memory, and the very nature of cinema. It’s a rare, unguarded glimpse into the mind of a master filmmaker grappling with themes that would define his later work. We see the genesis of ideas, the spark of recognition when a particular vista resonates with the melancholy weight of Nostalghia.
One fascinating aspect, easily missed perhaps on a fuzzy VHS copy viewed on a flickering CRT, is how the documentary format itself seems to align with Tarkovsky's own cinematic sensibilities. The pacing is unhurried, allowing moments of quiet contemplation. The camera often lingers on textures, faces, and landscapes, much like in his narrative films. It wasn't just about finding locations; it was about soaking in the atmosphere, letting the spirit of Italy seep into the project. You can almost feel the damp chill of the stone churches or the hazy warmth of a sun-drenched piazza they wander through.
The Weight of Exile
Watching this now, knowing it was filmed during Tarkovsky’s exile – a permanent state confirmed shortly after Nostalghia’s completion – lends Voyage in Time an added layer of poignancy. His longing for home, his discussions about the Russian soul versus the Italian temperament, feel incredibly raw and immediate. There’s a palpable sense of searching not just for film locations, but for connection, for understanding, in a land that is beautiful but resolutely not his own. Guerra acts as more than just a writer or guide; he's a crucial anchor, a sympathetic ear navigating Tarkovsky’s complex emotional landscape. Their easy camaraderie, punctuated by moments of intense discussion, forms the film's true heart.
For those of us who spent hours scanning video store shelves, Voyage in Time represents a particular kind of discovery. It wasn't the tape you rented for a Friday night party. It was the one you picked up out of curiosity, perhaps recognizing Tarkovsky's name, and settled in to watch alone, letting its quiet rhythms wash over you. It felt like privileged access, a peek behind the curtain not just of filmmaking, but of artistic creation itself. Finding this documentary, often tucked away, felt like unearthing a secret piece of cinematic history, a direct line to the thoughts of a director whose work often felt mythic and remote.
Lasting Impressions
Does Voyage in Time stand alone? Perhaps not entirely. Its deepest resonance comes from its connection to Nostalghia and to Tarkovsky's broader filmography and biography. It’s a companion piece, an extended footnote rich with insight. But as a document of creative collaboration, a portrait of an artist in exile, and a meditative travelogue through the soul of Italy, it possesses a unique, lingering power. It reminds us that the process of making art can be as compelling as the finished product, especially when observed with such intimacy and respect.
Rating: 8/10
This rating reflects the film's unique value as an intimate portrait of Andrei Tarkovsky during a pivotal, personally fraught period, and its fascinating function as a companion piece to Nostalghia. It’s not conventional entertainment, hence not higher, but for cinephiles, particularly those drawn to Tarkovsky or the art of filmmaking itself, it offers rare and profound insights. The conversational, observational style feels honest and deeply revealing, justifying its status as more than just a location scout video.
***
For those VHS tapes that offered more than just escapism, that invited quiet reflection long after the static hiss signaled the end… Voyage in Time holds a special place. It’s a reminder that sometimes, the most compelling journeys are the ones happening just off-screen.